December 19, 2018

Border Wall Update

We're officially on Insta! Did I throw on a blazer at 5 am for all you lovely people? You bet I did!

“President Donald Trump appeared Tuesday to back off his demand for $5 billion to build a border wall, signaling for the first time that he might be open to a deal that would avoid a partial government shutdown.” According to White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders, “the president would consider other options and the administration was looking at ways to find the money elsewhere.”
AP News

See past issues

From the Left

The left thinks the wall is an unnecessary government expenditure, and that a shutdown would be a losing issue for Republicans.

“It is hard to justify spending another $5 billion on Trump's vision, at a time when the budget deficit is soaring and other critical needs make a more compelling case for tax dollars. Despite a boomlet of refugees from Central America, illegal immigration is down significantly from its peak more than a decade ago. The other problem is that, of all of the ways to spend more money on immigration enforcement, wall building will arguably yield the smallest bang for the buck.”
USA Today

“Frustrated that neither Mexico nor Congress will pay for his border wall, President Donald Trump has directed his Cabinet to scrounge through the executive branch couch cushions to see what they can come up with… It’s unclear how much money that could produce, and whether Trump could legally order it transferred between agencies without permission from Congress.”
Huffington Post

Regarding Sanders’ statement that the administration is “not asking American taxpayers” to fund the wall, many point out that “any existing funding that other agencies have in their coffers is taxpayer money… trying to claim the money isn’t coming from the American public is either misinformed or misleading.”
Washington Post

“Before Mr. Trump took office, Republicans were more trusted than Democrats on immigration, but nowit’s Democrats who are more trusted… in the [2018] Election Eve poll, 57 percent of white voters in swing districts said Mr. Trump’s words and deeds made them angry. The net gain that Republicans thought they could count on from whites disappeared, with 50 percent now agreeing that Mr. Trump and the Republicans were using toxic rhetoric to divide Americans…

“The new showdown over the $5 billion border wall is likely to further alienate Mr. Trump from a majority of Americans.”
New York Times

Some note that “the White Housecould… have quietly, rationally made concessions earlier in this ‘negotiating’ round to get some funding for the wall in the Department of Homeland Security’s $50-billion budget, congressional aides say. Instead, Trump staged a showy fight with incoming speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer that only galvanized opposition in Congress.”
Quartz

“In theory, there’s no reason why a bad businessman can’t go on to become a good president. But a commander-in-chief whose signature legislative achievement expanded tax loopholes that he himself describes as grossly unfair is pretty much a bad president, by definition.”
Eric Levitz, New York Magazine

From the Right

The right supports the border wall, but is divided about the efficacy of a shutdown.

From the Right

The right supports the border wall, but is divided about the efficacy of a shutdown.

According to the president of the National Border Patrol Council, “construction of a border wall [is] ahumanitarian measure to dissuade migrants from undertaking dangerous journeys to enter the United States… 80 percent of illegal immigrant women and girls are raped during their travel… a border wall would discourage human smuggling and trafficking operations run by Mexican criminal cartels.”
Breitbart

Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-AZ) writes, “In 2000, the Department of Homeland Security built a wall in the Tucson, Arizona, sector. Over 15 years, border apprehensions from CBP dropped by 90 percent. In 2005, DHS built a wall in Yuma, Arizona. There, border apprehensions dropped 95 percent over nine years, according to CBP data…

"It will take more than just a physical barrier to solve the problem of illegal immigration once and for all. Butcoupled with more border patrol agents and enhanced technology, we can send the message that we are serious about securing our border.”
USA Today

“Nancy Pelosi calls the wall ‘immoral,’ even though walls already exist at various points along the border. Democrats, including Hillary Clinton when she was in the Senate, supported walls and backed expansion as part of a large immigration package… The only time Democrats seem concerned about excessive government expenditure is when national security is implicated.”
Daily Wire

“Support for President Trump’s border wall hit a record high… [It] just 33 percent in Quinnipiac’s polling in early 2017, as Mr. Trump took the reins of government after a long campaign of promising a border barrier. It reached 40 percent in April, as an earlier migrant caravan stormed the U.S., then dipped over the summer. But with new caravans sitting on the border again testing the U.S. boundary, support for the wall rose to 43 percent in the latest survey.”
Washington Times

Regarding Sanders’ announcement, some posit that “a shutdown over funding for the Wall never made much sense… so it’s not surprising the White House has begun to walk it back.”
National Review

Others, however, ask, “short of [a shutdown], what exactly will change in the next two years? A Democratic House will not approve wall funding, or any other of Trump’s priorities... If Trump wants the wall, it’s shutdown or bust.”
Conservative Review

Counterpoint: “after the War of 1812, President Madison… enacted the Tariff of 1816 to price British textiles out of competition, so Americans would build the new factories and capture the booming U.S. market. It worked. Tariffs [also] financed Mr. Lincoln’s War. The Tariff of 1890 bears the name of Ohio Congressman and future President William McKinley, who said that a foreign manufacturer ‘has no right or claim to equality with our own… He pays no taxes. He performs no civil duties’… [A tariff’s] purpose is not just to raise revenue but to make a nation economically independent of others, and to bring its citizens to rely upon each other rather than foreign entities.”
Patrick J. Buchanan, The American Conservative

A libertarian's take

“The scoop reflects poorly on Trump, who willfully misled the public for a decade in hopes of fraudulently representing himself as a man with a Midas touch. But he could not have succeeded without the assistance of many Americans, some mercenary, others over-credulous, who helped to spread the deceit and deception, generating countless newspaper articles, magazine stories, and TV segments that misinformed the public about the publicity hound’s record in business. New evidence of his staggering losses in that decade therefore provides an apt occasion to reflect on the media’s complicity in Trump’s brazen deceit and deception… Let [this] be a lesson for today’s tabloids, gossip columnists, over-credulous or mercenary journalists, and reality-television producers.”
Conor Friedersdorf, The Atlantic

On the bright side...

Get troll-free political news.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.