September 25, 2018

New Allegations Against Kavanaugh

We're officially on Insta! Did I throw on a blazer at 5 am for all you lovely people? You bet I did!

On Sunday, the New Yorker reported that “Senate Democrats are investigating a new allegation of sexual misconduct against Kavanaugh… Deborah Ramirez, a Yale classmate of Brett Kavanaugh’s, has described a dormitory party gone awry and a drunken incident that she wants the F.B.I. to investigate.” New Yorker

In a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee and an interview with Fox News, Kavanaugh denied accusations of sexual misconduct and stated that he “will not be intimidated into withdrawing.” Fox News

See past issues

From the Left

The left is calling for an investigation into the allegations to determine their credibility, arguing that “proof beyond a reasonable doubt" needn't exist for a Supreme Court nominee to not be confirmed. They also credit the #MeToo movement for progress toward making women’s voices heard.

“Over the period that the White House and Judiciary Committee majority have been jousting over the terms and conditions of the public hearing, the FBI could have already done much of what needs to be done — such as conducting some if not all of the interviews of the individuals identified as potential eyewitnesses."

The Atlantic

“In this case, ‘believe women’ just means taking the claim seriously. ‘Believe women’ means not reflexively disbelieving them because you're eager for a vote and an investigation would be inconvenient. ‘Believe women’ means acknowledging how shockingly, terribly normal it is for women and men to be sexually assaulted, and how shockingly, terribly normal it is for men to be the ones sexually assaulting them."


No one is entitled to a seat on the Supreme Court. It’s certainly reasonable to investigate Ford’s account; she herself has called for such an investigation. But that doesn’t mean that if she can’t prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Kavanaugh assaulted her, the American people owe him a lifetime job deciding some of the country’s most difficult and consequential cases, including those that affect women’s right to make decisions about their bodies."


Don’t tell me that Democrats will just smear the next candidate because they supposedly always do... no such charges surfaced against Neil Gorsuch, John Roberts or Samuel Alito... Nor have there been any against Donald Trump’s nominees for circuit court positions, or... against any of Trump’s cabinet officials... there’s no reason to believe that if Republicans sink this nomination that Democrats will respond with smears of other Republicans."


Regarding the #MeToo movement, “Before Ramirez came forward, Kavanaugh’s defenders all made a similar calculation: Either a powerful man with a wholesome public face (he coached girls’ basketball!) was lying or a woman was. And all of those defenders chose to discount the woman...

In cases of sexual misconduct, a lone woman’s voice often isn’t given the same weight as a man’s. But Ramirez’s account is a reminder of how far the #MeToo movement has come: When a woman stands up to report misconduct, she rarely stands alone for long. The movement has not yet overcome our society’s tendency to dismiss a single woman’s voice. But it has multiplied women’s voices until they can no longer be ignored.”


“Conservatives and liberals may differ on what constitutes that standard of proof. But that’s much better than differing on what constitutes acceptable sexual behavior. And it’s infinitely better than treating all women as liars. Even if Kavanaugh is confirmed, we should rest assured that the #MeToo movement has made a difference, however much work remains."

Washington Post

From the Right

The right argues that Kavanaugh should be presumed innocent until proven guilty. They are skeptical of the new allegations, suggesting that lowering the burden of proof will cause a backlash against the #MeToo movement.

From the Right

The right argues that Kavanaugh should be presumed innocent until proven guilty. They are skeptical of the new allegations, suggesting that lowering the burden of proof will cause a backlash against the #MeToo movement.

“Charges against public figures do have to meet some kind of burden of proof, even if far short of that required in a criminal trial... The problem isn’t that women are in general likely to lie about matters like rape or sexual assault—they aren’t. At issue is the fact that low evidentiary standards as a matter of principle inevitably lead to bad outcomes for the innocent."

The American Conservative

“Maybe the next few days will bring some new information, but for now, Democrats are dedicated to trying to stop the Kavanaugh nomination on the basis of a charge without verification...

Ford's supporters... think a credible allegation is enough to disqualify Kavanaugh. And even if that allegation is not, in fact, true -- even if Kavanaugh is innocent -- he is still disqualified. In the current battle, Kavanaugh's opposition is... trying to create an environment in which there is no way he can win.”

Washington Examiner

Many are questioning the journalistic standards of the New Yorker article.

“Presumably out of a shared belief that the sacrament of abortion might be threatened by a second Trump nominee serving on the court, some in the media are running multiple stories based on reputation-destroying allegations that have not come close to meeting a journalistic standard.”

The Federalist

Six classmates who Ramirez said would be able to substantiate her story, one of them her college best friend, have categorically denied, to Farrow and Mayer, that any such incident took place... This is not journalism. This is a bizarre political stage show where the actors are all working toward the same curtain call."

Fox News

“It’s important to reiterate the substantial differences between the claims against Kavanaugh and the claims against virtually any other politician or celebrity brought low in this Me Too moment. Whether you’re looking at Roy Moore, Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, or Al Franken, you’ll find substantial evidence beyond the word of the accusers, including contemporaneous corroboration and on occasion even physical evidence...

“[By contrast] there is not a single third-party witness to any claim that can corroborate any accuser or even conclusively place Kavanaugh at the location of any alleged crime... The available evidence simply doesn’t meet any conceivable burden of proof.”

National Review

“The Me Too movement has gained immense influence over the last year precisely because it has encouraged us to acknowledge the reality of sexual abuse and follow the truth wherever it leads. Now, the question of whether the accusations against Kavanaugh are true has been subjugated to a political endgame... All of this will add up to the average person, who naturally wants justice for survivors, being less inclined to take sexual-abuse allegations seriously."

National Review

“The Democrats want to talk to Don McGahn, and maybe they will ultimately prevail in court to get his testimony, but what’s the point? McGahn talked extensively to Mueller, and surely everything remotely damaging is already in the report

“Congress has the report, and now it is up to it to decide. But it doesn’t want to. It’s too painful to admit that the Mueller report was a bust on Russia and that the obstruction material, while damaging to Trump, is hardly a slam dunk; that the public doesn’t support impeachment; that if the House goes through with it anyway, it will end with a whimper in the Senate; and that it’s better for Democrats to focus on beating Trump in 2020 than a forlorn impeachment.”
Rich Lowry, National Review

Noteworthy datapoint

The biggest divide on issues like the Kavanaugh case is not between men and women, but between Democrats and Republicans.


A libertarian's take

“The scoop reflects poorly on Trump, who willfully misled the public for a decade in hopes of fraudulently representing himself as a man with a Midas touch. But he could not have succeeded without the assistance of many Americans, some mercenary, others over-credulous, who helped to spread the deceit and deception, generating countless newspaper articles, magazine stories, and TV segments that misinformed the public about the publicity hound’s record in business. New evidence of his staggering losses in that decade therefore provides an apt occasion to reflect on the media’s complicity in Trump’s brazen deceit and deception… Let [this] be a lesson for today’s tabloids, gossip columnists, over-credulous or mercenary journalists, and reality-television producers.”
Conor Friedersdorf, The Atlantic

On the bright side...

Get troll-free political news.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.