“Portraits of four former House of Representatives speakers who served the Confederacy will be removed from the U.S. Capitol, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said [last] Thursday.” Reuters
“Protesters who took to the streets in Portland, Oregon for the 22nd consecutive night tore down a statue of George Washington that was erected in the 1920s, the Portland Police Bureau said [last] Friday.” AP News
Last weekend, “Protesters tore down more statues across the United States, expanding the razing in a San Francisco park to the writer of America’s national anthem and [Ulysses Grant], the general who won the country’s Civil War that ended widespread slavery.” AP News
“The American Museum of Natural History will remove a prominent statue of Theodore Roosevelt from its entrance after years of objections that it symbolizes colonial expansion and racial discrimination, Mayor Bill de Blasio said Sunday.” AP News
See our previous coverage of Confederate monuments here. The Flip Side
The right generally opposes removing statues.
“This current anti-monument wave degrades what originated as a legitimate grievance: the presence of Confederate monuments, many erected during the Jim Crow era to perpetuate the Lost Cause myth and advance white supremacy. But that idea has been taken over now by what has turned into a mob intent on willy-nilly eradication of chunks of American history…
“During the recent protests in Boston, we saw the spray-painting of the Shaw 54th Regiment Memorial, a monument to the first African-American regiment to fight in the Civil War and an emblem of racial reconciliation and harmony. On Friday they toppled a statue of Ulysses S. Grant in San Francisco. Never mind that as President, Grant enforced Reconstruction, lobbied for passage of the Fifteenth Amendment and prosecuted the Ku Klux Klan.”
Editorial Board, Wall Street Journal
Similarly, “Philadelphia protesters went and defaced a statue of Matthias Baldwin, an abolitionist who had attacked slavery, fought for black people's right to vote, and founded a school for black children that he ran largely out of his own pocket. He did more to advance the principles of equality and justice than most people alive today, yet protesters slandered his memory with the words ‘colonizer’ and ‘murderer’ spray-painted in bright red across his face. As if in a frenzy of self-parody, protesters have similarly defaced memorials to Abraham Lincoln, Winston Churchill (the man is honored for defeating the Nazis), and even Charles de Gaulle…
“This is where it becomes clear that the Left's iconoclasts do not care for the facts or the history. If their concern had anything to do with removing memorials to racism and white supremacy, they would not have touched Baldwin’s statue. But they did — because Baldwin is a white man who existed in the past. As such, he must be considered part of the problem. America’s entire history deserves condemnation, according to the Left… The things we’ve accomplished as a nation, including the unprecedented harmony we enjoy amid racial diversity, do not matter as much as the flaws of the past do.”
Kaylee McGhee, Washington Examiner
“We don't honor any of the founders because they were sinners — because they owned slaves or shared common, bigoted attitudes of their day. We honor them for those things they did that were bigger than their time. We honor them because they risked hanging and made great personal sacrifices to establish a free, prosperous republic governed by and for its people — including, ultimately, people of all races… When we celebrate our Founding Fathers, we're celebrating the egalitarian values they espoused in spite of the fact that most of the signers of the Declaration of Independence were slaveholders…
“Defending our celebration of the Founding Fathers doesn't necessitate defending their worst crimes. In fact, it's the perfect time to acknowledge how messy and tragic the origins of the greatest nation in history were from the start. But we ought to defend the men who gave us a republic with the DNA to become a nation where we strive to instill equal rights under the law.”
Tiana Lowe, Washington Examiner
“There are those who say that Western civilization itself ought to be undone — that monuments to people such as these ought to be destroyed because of their participation in an endeavor that included global colonialism and racism…
“[But] Just about every pre-modern political regime was predicated upon the idea that its purported superiority justified treating outsiders over whom it ruled as if those people were not human beings. Aztecs murdered their war captives as human sacrifices to their gods. Many black Africans did not see other black Africans as fellow human beings to be protected against white slave traders; instead, they simply captured them and sold them to profit themselves. Mongol conquest of Russia and China was brutal and tyrannical as the warrior clan ruled on its own and for its own benefit…
“Modern Western civilization and its revolutionary ideals, however, have allowed for the peaceful, pan-racial democracies protesters say they want. The West’s ideals of universal freedom and human equality permit it to reform itself peacefully and extend the reality of freedom to fit the reality of human diversity. We take a multiethnic, free state for granted, but no such thing had ever existed before modern times. That is the achievement that statues to people such as Washington and Grant honor, an achievement that makes today’s protesters possible.”
Henry Olsen, Washington Post
Finally, “There is no doubt that [Roosevelt] partook of the prejudices of his time and reflected some of its worst intellectual influences, particularly Social Darwinism. But he was the characteristic American of the early 20th century, who exulted in his country and made enduring contributions to it. It is for that, that we honor him, and the museum of natural history is one of the obvious places to do it, given that his father was a founding member and TR was a great naturalist and conservationist.”
Rich Lowry, National Review
The left supports removing confederate statues, and calls for further discussion regarding those of former presidents.
The left supports removing confederate statues, and calls for further discussion regarding those of former presidents.
“[McConnell] called it ‘nonsense that we need to airbrush the Capitol and scrub out everybody from years ago who had any connection to slavery’… The real nonsense is McConnell’s suggestion that slavery and the Civil War are just minor imperfections and blemishes and that the Confederate soldiers and politicians whose statues stand in the Capitol Building only had a ‘connection’ to slavery. As General (Ret) David H. Petraeus recently pointed out, the Confederate leaders ‘committed treason’ by taking up arms against their country. And they had much more than a ‘connection’ to slavery.”
Gregory J. Wallace, The Hill
“[McConnell] felt moved to list for reporters some of the early presidents who owned slaves. ‘Washington did. Jefferson did. Madison did. Monroe did’…
“None of those presidents, it should be noted, went to war against the United States to defend slavery. Nor are all the 11 statues of peripheral figures who had just ‘any connection’ to the war for chattel slavery. The statues include one of Jefferson Davis, the president of the Confederate States of America; Alexander Hamilton Stephens, the vice president; and its most famous general, Robert E. Lee. There are other statues of men less central to the rebel cause. But given that states can select any person of note from their state, surely there are many other men or women who don’t have the Confederacy on their résumés.”
Editorial Board, New York Times
“There is an obvious difference between George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, who founded our union, and, say, Jefferson Davis and Stonewall Jackson, who tried to destroy it. The fact that Washington, Jefferson and other early presidents owned slaves should temper our admiration for them but not erase it entirely. They gave us a nation grotesquely disfigured by slavery, but they also gave us the constitutional tools, and the high-minded ideals, with which to heal that original, near-fatal flaw…
“[Regarding Teddy Roosevelt] He was relatively enlightened for his times: He invited civil rights leader Booker T. Washington to dine at the White House, for which he was pilloried. And he did much to preserve wildlife (when he wasn’t shooting it) and our natural wonders. The problem is the statuary itself. Roosevelt is astride a horse, and flanking him — on foot, thus beneath the great man — are a Native American man on one side and an African man on the other. The tableau amounts to a visual parable of white supremacy. We put statues in places of honor to depict our heroes and our values. Overt racism is not an idea we honor.”
Eugene Robinson, Washington Post
Some point out that “In an 1886 speech in New York, [Teddy Roosevelt] declared: I don’t go so far as to think that the only good Indian is the dead Indian, but I believe nine out of every ten are, and I shouldn’t like to inquire too closely into the case of the tenth…
“That same year Roosevelt published a book in which he wrote that ‘the so-called Chivington or Sandy [sic] Creek Massacre, in spite of certain most objectionable details, was on the whole as righteous and beneficial a deed as ever took place on the frontier.’ The Sand Creek massacre had occurred 22 years previously in the Colorado Territory, wiping out a village of over 100 Cheyenne and Arapaho people. It was in every way comparable to the My Lai massacre during the Vietnam War… As Teddy Roosevelt’s status falls, let’s remember how truly dark his history was.”
Jon Schwarz, The Intercept
Others write, “I warned five years ago that we’re rushing down this road with only the haziest notion of where we’ll wind up. Now that we have a better idea (Cervantes? Who hates Cervantes?), it’s less clear than ever that the road is worth taking. But if this is to be our journey, we would do better to travel it democratically. Decisions about which historical figures to (literally) deplatform should be taken within, not outside of, the ordinary processes of political debate… Racial flat-earthers who insist on defending them all don’t have much of a case; but neither do those who think the decision should rest on anything less than proper democratic debate.”
Stephen L. Carter, Bloomberg
“Of the estimated 5,193 public statues depicting historic figures on display on street corners and parks throughout the United States, only 394 of these monuments are of women. There are even fewer depicting Black historic figures. This answers the question of who gets to be memorialized in America…
“Groups like Philadelphia's Monument Lab are helping cities focus on what they want their monuments to say about their collective histories and futures. In the fall of 2017, Monument Lab started a weeks-long project where they set up 10 ‘labs’ across Philadelphia where visitors were invited to answer the question: ‘What is an appropriate monument for Philadelphia today?’… It's a model that could be implemented by cities that are now debating what to do with the space left behind by the Confederate monuments.
Ashlie D. Stevens, Salon